Draft script:
I have discussed Earth’s energy imbalance frequently in this space. The collective actions of billions of people on Earth are causing a tremendous difference between the energy released into the atmosphere and the energy captured and sequestered by organisms on Earth. As Industrial Civilization produces more greenhouse gases that trap more energy, this difference continues to grow. As I have pointed out many times in this space, based on five peer-reviewed papers, civilization is a heat engine, regardless how civilization is driven.
Earth naturally sequesters carbon dioxide, a primary greenhouse gas. Most of this sequestration is conducted via photosynthesis on land and coral reefs at sea. However, the ongoing and accelerating energy imbalance is causing a stunningly rapid heating of Earth. Even the designed-to-fail Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has concluded that Earth is amid the most rapid heating in planetary heating. The IPCC also concluded climate change is irreversible.
Recent findings come in the form of a peer-reviewed, open-access paper published in AGU Advances. AGU stands for American Geophysical Union, an international, nonprofit scientific association whose mission is “to promote discovery in Earth and space science for the benefit of humanity.” AGU Advances is one of the peer-reviewed journals produced by the American Geophysical Union.
The peer-reviewed, open-access paper in AGU Advances was published on 10 May 2025. Produced by 57 scholars, the paper is titled Earth’s Energy Imbalance More Than Doubled in Recent Decades.
After a short Abstract, the peer-reviewed paper presents three Key Points and a Plain Language Summary. I will begin with these:
The three Key Points are
(1) “Earth’s Energy imbalance more than doubled in recent decades.”
(2) “The large trend has taken us by surprise, and as a community we should strive to understand the underlying causes.”
(3) “Our capability to observe the Earth’s energy imbalance and budget terms is threatened as satellites are decommissioned.”
The Plain Language Summary provides exactly that: “Global warming is caused by the imbalance between the incoming radiation from the Sun and the reflected and outgoing infrared radiation from the Earth. The imbalance leads to energy accumulation in the atmosphere, oceans and land, and melting of the cryosphere, resulting in increasing temperatures, rising sea levels, and more extreme weather around the globe according … [to] the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change ... Observations from space of the energy imbalance shows that it is rising much faster than expected, and in 2023 it reached values two times higher than the best estimate from IPCC. We argue that we must strive to better understand this fundamental change in Earth's climate state, and ensure our capacity to monitor it in the future.”
The Abstract provides a science-based overview of the peer-reviewed paper: “Global warming results from anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions which upset the delicate balance between the incoming sunlight, and the reflected and emitted radiation from Earth. The imbalance leads to energy accumulation in the atmosphere, oceans and land, and melting of the cryosphere, resulting in increasing temperatures, rising sea levels, and more extreme weather around the globe. Despite the fundamental role of the energy imbalance in regulating the climate system, as known to humanity for more than two centuries, our capacity to observe it is rapidly deteriorating as satellites are being decommissioned.”
This comes as no surprise to me, and probably to you. The current presidential administration in the country of my birth is an embarrassment to the few rational citizens. Referring to climate change as a hoax, president Donald Trump disregards the process of science and the reliable knowledge it produces. I doubt Trump understands either the point or the process of science.
The first figure in the peer-reviewed paper presents a graphical overview of the energy imbalance during the period between 2001 and 2024. This figure clearly shows profound increase in energy imbalance during this short period of time. The blue line shows the linear trend over the 2001–2024 period. Although there is plenty of variation during this short period of time, the increase in energy imbalance is clear. Gray shading shows years affected by three major El Niño Southern Oscillation events.
A description of the Figure is provided in the second paragraph of the peer-reviewed paper, which relies upon additional peer-reviewed evidence: “Worryingly, the observed energy imbalance is rising much faster than expected, reaching 1.8 Watts/m2 in 2023—or twice that predicted by climate models—after having more than doubled within just two decades ... This strong upward trend in the imbalance is difficult to reconcile with climate models: even if the increase in anthropogenic radiative forcing and associated climate response are accounted for, state-of-the-art global climate models can only barely reproduce the rate of change up to 2020 within the observational uncertainty ... The continued rise in the energy imbalance since 2020 leaves us with little doubt that the real world signal has left the envelope of model internal variability. The root cause of the discrepancy between models and observations is currently not well known, but it seems to be dominated by a decrease in Earth’s solar reflectivity …, and model experiments suggest it could be due to poorly modeled sea surface temperature patterns, the representation and emissions of polluting aerosol particles, or something else ...
There we have it, folks. “The root cause of the discrepancy between models and observations is currently not well known, but it seems to be dominated by” this, that, “or something else.” Color me shocked. Models and observations aren’t keeping up with reality. Not surprisingly, there is no mention of the IPCC’s conclusion that Earth is amid the fastest rate of environmental change in planetary history. There is no mention that this rapid rate of change results from anthropogenic climate change. There is no mention of the strong supporting evidence used by the IPCC to reach this conclusion on 8 October 2018 in its Global Warming of 1.5o.
Hi Guy! Thanks for this and I printed off a copy of the AGU Mauritsen ET AL. paper and I have lots of questions! These “experts” seem to ignore the central role of anthropomorphic heat generation, the vast sequestering effects of the 1.2 trillion tons of global ice and the 321 million cubic miles of oceans. Their Fig. 2 graph is absurd. They are predicting a 1.8 degC GAST by 2070, and you and I believe that we’re there already or damned close NOW. Also, they are delusional if they really believe that any effort will be made to reduce fossil fuel burning in any future controlled by Tramp, the fossil fuel lobby, and the GQP oilmen/women. As I have said before, no one accounts for the 6.6 X 10 to the 12th BTUs of body heat energy generated and released by us and our meat/milk animals EVERY DAY, or the heat generated by burning 8 billion tons of coal+ annually, or the 100 million barrels of oil burned DAILY. Sure, as you know, the GHG production is important but isn’t it really about the HEAT GENERATI0N? It was 60 degF yesterday in southern Greenland, where at least 30-33 million tons of glacial ice are melting every hour (UCAR). The Gulf of Mexico is reaching 90 degF every day max in the afternoon now. I am still puzzled by the current lowering of surface and ocean surface temp’s, as seen on the C3S “Climate Pulse” page. I’m just an 80yo retired physician/psychiatrist with cognitive deficits from Long COVID and prostate cancer treatment, but…. WTF? Thanks for this piece and have a blessed day! Gregg
The subject paper in this analysis clearly shows non-linearity in the climate system yet the paper doesn't indicate any real sense of urgency.
“Worryingly, the observed energy imbalance is rising much faster than expected", how quaint, I'm unsure what the scholars were expecting once we've triggered at least 6 dozen feedback loops!
I'm not in the least bit surprised by the acceleration, no one else should be either.
Late last century Michael Mann et al came up with the "Hockey Stick" projection that demonstrated non-linearity in the climate system, now no one seems able to see it anymore, or more honestly accept it.
Narrative control will be central to Guy and my upcoming video analysis as we chronicle the great unravelling. Our next collaboration will be in early September.
Earlier this month IOP science published a new paper on how food production is tanking, that too is accelerating. I'll drop it below for additional reference.
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/ade45f?fbclid=IwY2xjawL0sdtleHRuA2FlbQIxMABicmlkETFTMHlxNHJUaHBEYXpEQXdFAR5H0uxiMHw-x2ROuIrGb5mE9hX3N4jAIwZHik-HpjgincsOtUIbO51nspTmMw_aem_7kIeSOX2pjotVv9AlXPkTA